Difference between revisions of "June 2006 Agenda"
(→Possible Agenda Items) |
(→Possible Agenda Items) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says on June 8th:''' ''Right now, I'd offer my consent to the second of these without further ado. I can't speak for anyone other than myself, of course. Meanwhile, I have reservations bordering on paramount objections to the board meeting agenda process proposal. And I would enjoy a lot more clarity about a) what we might ask Jori to achieve by October 2006 and b) how we intend to explore other stratagies that could meet the same needs as appointing either an Interim or a Permanent ED in time to review Jori's position again in October.'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says on June 8th:''' ''Right now, I'd offer my consent to the second of these without further ado. I can't speak for anyone other than myself, of course. Meanwhile, I have reservations bordering on paramount objections to the board meeting agenda process proposal. And I would enjoy a lot more clarity about a) what we might ask Jori to achieve by October 2006 and b) how we intend to explore other stratagies that could meet the same needs as appointing either an Interim or a Permanent ED in time to review Jori's position again in October.'' |
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says on June 8th:''' ''The Board Meeting Agenda Process proposal suggests members of the Board/GCC might choose to prepare for meetings by contributing through this Wiki. I am unable to find the information I would like at this Wiki that would allow me to feel confident in contributing feedback around needs met/not met by certain activities however. For example, I notice a possible agenda item, New nomination(s) to the Board as GCC representative, and I, for one, would really like to know something about the people being nominated - which areas they aim to represent and for how long, how many of them there are, and whether we intend to cap participation in teleconferences/the number of voting members in the GCC at least until such time as we've gotten our own processes more effectively sorted out, etc. I will be happy to read any information that can be provided to me ahead of time. Where no information can be provided ahead of time, I am likely to ask many more clarifying questions during meeting time than I am confident others will enjoy. Also, I would prefer that whatever concrete information is available around these issues be made available via a more accessible medium than the teleconference - i.e. actually the Wiki seems to be the ideal space to post information, and an unideal space to facilitate discussion.'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says on June 8th:''' ''The Board Meeting Agenda Process proposal suggests members of the Board/GCC might choose to prepare for meetings by contributing through this Wiki. I am unable to find the information I would like at this Wiki that would allow me to feel confident in contributing feedback around needs met/not met by certain activities however. For example, I notice a possible agenda item, New nomination(s) to the Board as GCC representative, and I, for one, would really like to know something about the people being nominated - which areas they aim to represent and for how long, how many of them there are, and whether we intend to cap participation in teleconferences/the number of voting members in the GCC at least until such time as we've gotten our own processes more effectively sorted out, etc. I will be happy to read any information that can be provided to me ahead of time. Where no information can be provided ahead of time, I am likely to ask many more clarifying questions during meeting time than I am confident others will enjoy. Also, I would prefer that whatever concrete information is available around these issues be made available via a more accessible medium than the teleconference - i.e. actually the Wiki seems to be the ideal space to post information, and an unideal space to facilitate discussion.'' |
* '''New nomination(s) to the Board as GCC representative.''' | * '''New nomination(s) to the Board as GCC representative.''' | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says:''' ''Could we please get a written description of the intended difference between a GCC representative and a member of the Board - i.e. something that describes the amount of time/energy/money we are asking these people to invest in our activities?'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says:''' ''Could we please get a written description of the intended difference between a GCC representative and a member of the Board - i.e. something that describes the amount of time/energy/money we are asking these people to invest in our activities?'' |
* '''Update on database, wiki, blog and other technology support options.''' | * '''Update on database, wiki, blog and other technology support options.''' | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says:''' ''If this is really just an update, perhaps John Wiley could post a written report here or somewhere else? If what's wanted are decisions about how to move something forwards, I'd sooner see an agenda item that states what we are being asked to make a decision about.'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says:''' ''If this is really just an update, perhaps John Wiley could post a written report here or somewhere else? If what's wanted are decisions about how to move something forwards, I'd sooner see an agenda item that states what we are being asked to make a decision about.'' |
* '''Update on GCC process.''' | * '''Update on GCC process.''' | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says:''' ''Could this state whether or not we'll be developing a written description of the different roles performed by members of the Board and representatives to the GCC?'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says:''' ''Could this state whether or not we'll be developing a written description of the different roles performed by members of the Board and representatives to the GCC?'' |
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* '''Evaluation of the role of the interim director position and Jori's work in relation to this role, for decision on renewal until Sept 30, 2006.''' | * '''Evaluation of the role of the interim director position and Jori's work in relation to this role, for decision on renewal until Sept 30, 2006.''' | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says:''' ''Evaluation of the position first, followed by evaluation of Jori's work in relation to this role? Also, didn't we say renewal until Oct, 2006, to coincide with the face-to-face meeting in Atlanta?'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says:''' ''Evaluation of the position first, followed by evaluation of Jori's work in relation to this role? Also, didn't we say renewal until Oct, 2006, to coincide with the face-to-face meeting in Atlanta?'' |
* '''Board meeting location, frequency and review of Needs/strategies.''' | * '''Board meeting location, frequency and review of Needs/strategies.''' | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says:''' ''Move this to the October agenda? I'm guessing our situation may be very different by then, and it seems important to me to get some input from GCC reps as to how much time/money their groups are willing to contribute.'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says:''' ''Move this to the October agenda? I'm guessing our situation may be very different by then, and it seems important to me to get some input from GCC reps as to how much time/money their groups are willing to contribute.'' |
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
* '''Update on meeting in Atlanta.''' | * '''Update on meeting in Atlanta.''' | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says:''' ''Make this a consent item - i.e. we will meet face-to-face in Atlanta as per the agreement made in New Mexico?'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says:''' ''Make this a consent item - i.e. we will meet face-to-face in Atlanta as per the agreement made in New Mexico?'' |
* '''Additional Discussion, additional Agenda Items, or Observer feedback.''' | * '''Additional Discussion, additional Agenda Items, or Observer feedback.''' | ||
| − | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz]] says:''' ''I'd love to hear an update on John Buck's attempts to estimate a budget to cover the implimentation of Sociocracy as this seems to me fairly key in supporting Circles forming in the network whilst also supporting John's own need for sustainability.'' | + | '''[[user:lg4nvc| Liz Gay]] says:''' ''I'd love to hear an update on John Buck's attempts to estimate a budget to cover the implimentation of Sociocracy as this seems to me fairly key in supporting Circles forming in the network whilst also supporting John's own need for sustainability.'' |
Revision as of 02:46, 11 June 2006
- Click here to return to the main CNVC Board page.
Draft June Agenda
Date/Time: Thursday, 22 June at 3pm UTC/GMT, 8am PT, 5pm CET, 4pm London, 11pm Singapore time.
- Note: to find out the current Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) and Universal Time (UTC, which is the same as GMT), click on this link: Current Time (USN)
Possible Agenda Items
- Consent Round
- Accceptance of board meeting agenda process proposal
- Face-to-face meeting to take place in Atlanta as scheduled
- Jori to remain as iterim ED to achieve specific goals by October 2006
Liz Gay says on June 8th: Right now, I'd offer my consent to the second of these without further ado. I can't speak for anyone other than myself, of course. Meanwhile, I have reservations bordering on paramount objections to the board meeting agenda process proposal. And I would enjoy a lot more clarity about a) what we might ask Jori to achieve by October 2006 and b) how we intend to explore other stratagies that could meet the same needs as appointing either an Interim or a Permanent ED in time to review Jori's position again in October.
- Items that could be posted here
Liz Gay says on June 8th: The Board Meeting Agenda Process proposal suggests members of the Board/GCC might choose to prepare for meetings by contributing through this Wiki. I am unable to find the information I would like at this Wiki that would allow me to feel confident in contributing feedback around needs met/not met by certain activities however. For example, I notice a possible agenda item, New nomination(s) to the Board as GCC representative, and I, for one, would really like to know something about the people being nominated - which areas they aim to represent and for how long, how many of them there are, and whether we intend to cap participation in teleconferences/the number of voting members in the GCC at least until such time as we've gotten our own processes more effectively sorted out, etc. I will be happy to read any information that can be provided to me ahead of time. Where no information can be provided ahead of time, I am likely to ask many more clarifying questions during meeting time than I am confident others will enjoy. Also, I would prefer that whatever concrete information is available around these issues be made available via a more accessible medium than the teleconference - i.e. actually the Wiki seems to be the ideal space to post information, and an unideal space to facilitate discussion.
- New nomination(s) to the Board as GCC representative.
Liz Gay says: Could we please get a written description of the intended difference between a GCC representative and a member of the Board - i.e. something that describes the amount of time/energy/money we are asking these people to invest in our activities?
- Update on database, wiki, blog and other technology support options.
Liz Gay says: If this is really just an update, perhaps John Wiley could post a written report here or somewhere else? If what's wanted are decisions about how to move something forwards, I'd sooner see an agenda item that states what we are being asked to make a decision about.
- Update on GCC process.
Liz Gay says: Could this state whether or not we'll be developing a written description of the different roles performed by members of the Board and representatives to the GCC?
- Determine next steps for updating the Board Policies.
- Evaluation of the role of the interim director position and Jori's work in relation to this role, for decision on renewal until Sept 30, 2006.
Liz Gay says: Evaluation of the position first, followed by evaluation of Jori's work in relation to this role? Also, didn't we say renewal until Oct, 2006, to coincide with the face-to-face meeting in Atlanta?
- Board meeting location, frequency and review of Needs/strategies.
Liz Gay says: Move this to the October agenda? I'm guessing our situation may be very different by then, and it seems important to me to get some input from GCC reps as to how much time/money their groups are willing to contribute.
- Election of Vice President.
- Term: 1 year
- Responsibilities:
- Track Board agreements for agenda items.
- Assume President's responsibilities in President's absence.
- Update on meeting in Atlanta.
Liz Gay says: Make this a consent item - i.e. we will meet face-to-face in Atlanta as per the agreement made in New Mexico?
- Additional Discussion, additional Agenda Items, or Observer feedback.
Liz Gay says: I'd love to hear an update on John Buck's attempts to estimate a budget to cover the implimentation of Sociocracy as this seems to me fairly key in supporting Circles forming in the network whilst also supporting John's own need for sustainability.
- Board check out: what worked and didn't work?
- Click here to return to the main CNVC Board page.
