Difference between revisions of "Instant Messaging Network/temp"

Latest revision as of 06:59, 2 March 2007

current
- Email Instant Messaging Network/Email for answering invention (current system)
suggested
- Web form (wizard) Instant Messaging Network/Web for answering invention (only the planning)
  - I belive Web form is better
    - No need for the user to send back email - recive questions and send the answers.
    - A web link is accable by email.
    - To create a web form
      - need web space

In the ideal world for the network:

Any member would use his preferred IM which will be bridged to any other IM.
Shared group - when adding a new member to the group the group is updated for all members.
Every IM would have a group of switchable database of nvcIM network members.
Text chats/voice chats would have unlimited number of people which can use any IM.

In reality:

Some IM are bridged
- Yahoo-Live messenger (MSN)
- ICQ-AOL
- TODO: check if multiprotocol instant messaging applications can bridge network for group chats.
  - Trillian
    - there is group chat but you can't select a few people and add them to the chat
Shared group
- only with skype (starting from 2.5)
Search able group members
- only with skype by changing the username and then searching within it.
Text/voice chats
- Skype 100 people
- to fill in others

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== The mechanics of approaching and registering people ==
+Most people will be approached via email
+[[Instant Messaging Network/Email of invention]]
+*current
+** Email [[Instant Messaging Network/Email for answering invention]] (current system)
+*suggested
+** Web form (wizard) [[Instant Messaging Network/Web for answering invention]] (only the planning)
+***I belive Web form is better
+**** No need for the user to send back email - recive questions and send the answers.
+**** A web link is accable by email.
+****To create a web form
+***** need web space
 ==== ideal world vs. reality ====