Difference between revisions of "Needs are met"

From NVCWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Below is a list of Needs that can be met by using and supporting free [[Open Source]] software (abbreviated to "OSS" below). You are invited to add items and comments.
+
Below is a list of Needs that can be met by using and supporting [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html free software] (often called "open source" software, though these [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html terms make a difference]). You are invited to add items and comments.
*Collaboration - people work together to build OSS.
+
 
*Openness - there is no secret code in OSS.
+
* Freedom - [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html four kinds of]
*Safety and Trust - because there are no secrets, it's easier to trust developers.
+
* Collaboration - people work together to build free software.
*Financial ease - most OSS is free.
+
* No additional cost per installation, so it can be shared freely.
*Evolutionary creativity - new features can be added or requested by anyone.
+
* Equality - more computers can run typical free software than can run typical commercial software.
*Community and mutuality - it's fun to contribute.
+
* Internationality - most free software has multiple language support.
*Cooperation (power with) - everyone's needs matter more equally.
+
* Openness - there is no secret code in free software.
*Stimulation - OSS is only limited by our ability to dream and contribute.
+
* Understanding/Learning - how software does, what it does. (At least for programmers)
 +
* Safety and Trust - because there are no secrets, it's easier to trust developers. Safety, because there are often many programmers watching for and fixing security wholes.
 +
* Financial ease - most free software is free (not only as in "free speech" but also as in "free beer").
 +
* Evolutionary creativity - new features can be added or requested by anyone.
 +
* Community and mutuality - it's fun to contribute.
 +
* Cooperation (power with) - everyone's needs matter more equally.
 +
* Stimulation - free software is only limited by our ability to dream and contribute.
 +
 
 +
=== Comments ===
 +
 
 +
* I am scared of OSS being difficult to learn and use.
 +
* I was too, but found out that some OSS is easier than some commercial.

Latest revision as of 17:39, 17 August 2006

Below is a list of Needs that can be met by using and supporting free software (often called "open source" software, though these terms make a difference). You are invited to add items and comments.

  • Freedom - four kinds of
  • Collaboration - people work together to build free software.
  • No additional cost per installation, so it can be shared freely.
  • Equality - more computers can run typical free software than can run typical commercial software.
  • Internationality - most free software has multiple language support.
  • Openness - there is no secret code in free software.
  • Understanding/Learning - how software does, what it does. (At least for programmers)
  • Safety and Trust - because there are no secrets, it's easier to trust developers. Safety, because there are often many programmers watching for and fixing security wholes.
  • Financial ease - most free software is free (not only as in "free speech" but also as in "free beer").
  • Evolutionary creativity - new features can be added or requested by anyone.
  • Community and mutuality - it's fun to contribute.
  • Cooperation (power with) - everyone's needs matter more equally.
  • Stimulation - free software is only limited by our ability to dream and contribute.

Comments

  • I am scared of OSS being difficult to learn and use.
  • I was too, but found out that some OSS is easier than some commercial.