https://en.nvcwiki.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AAugust_2006_GCC_Meeting_Minutes 2026-04-08T15:04:46Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.28.0 https://en.nvcwiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:August_2006_GCC_Meeting_Minutes&diff=9512&oldid=prev 2007-04-17T12:19:59Z

<p>made link visible</p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:19, 17 April 2007</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I vaguely remember this [[August 2006 GCC Meeting Minutes#Decision: 3]] decision going by last year and just wanted to note, for the sake of clarity, that the terms described would not fall into anyone's definition of open content that i have heard of. Freedom to copy is a part of it, but the freedom to modify and redistribute is also central, and these terms clearly do not allow this. If you did want to license any CNVC materials under an open license, it sounds like the closest thing would be the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license. See [http://creativecommons.org/license/] to explore this. --[[User:John Abbe|John Abbe]] 21:21, 15 April 2007 (CEST)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I vaguely remember this [[August 2006 GCC Meeting Minutes#Decision: 3]] decision going by last year and just wanted to note, for the sake of clarity, that the terms described would not fall into anyone's definition of open content that i have heard of. Freedom to copy is a part of it, but the freedom to modify and redistribute is also central, and these terms clearly do not allow this. If you did want to license any CNVC materials under an open license, it sounds like the closest thing would be the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license. See [http://creativecommons.org/license <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">http:</ins>/<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">/creativecommons.org/license</ins>] to explore this. --[[User:John Abbe|John Abbe]] 21:21, 15 April 2007 (CEST)</div></td></tr> </table>

Nvcwikiop https://en.nvcwiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:August_2006_GCC_Meeting_Minutes&diff=9501&oldid=prev 2007-04-15T19:21:17Z

<p>Clarity re the meaning of open licensing</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>I vaguely remember this [[August 2006 GCC Meeting Minutes#Decision: 3]] decision going by last year and just wanted to note, for the sake of clarity, that the terms described would not fall into anyone's definition of open content that i have heard of. Freedom to copy is a part of it, but the freedom to modify and redistribute is also central, and these terms clearly do not allow this. If you did want to license any CNVC materials under an open license, it sounds like the closest thing would be the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license. See [http://creativecommons.org/license/] to explore this. --[[User:John Abbe|John Abbe]] 21:21, 15 April 2007 (CEST)</div>

John Abbe